Apple Damages January 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013 | ||||
Date | 3/31/2013 | 6/30/2013 | 9/28/2013 | 12/31/2013 |
Total Revenue Per Unit | ||||
iPhone | $ 22,955,000,000 | $ 18,154,000,000 | $ 19,510,000,000 | $ 32,498,000,000 |
iPad | 6,374,000,000 | 8,746,000,000 | 6,186,000,000 | 11,468,000,000 |
iPod | 962,000,000 | 4,569,000,000 | 573,000,000 | 973,000,000 |
Americas Revenue % | 32.23% | 40.78% | 37.20% | 34.90% |
Americas Revenue | 3/31/2013 | 6/30/2013 | 9/28/2013 | 12/31/2013 |
iPhone | $ 7,397,740,064 | $ 7,403,345,412 | $ 7,258,457,248 | $ 11,340,500,816 |
iPad | 2,054,157,925 | 3,566,688,277 | 2,301,425,758 | 4,001,872,834 |
iPod | 310,025,090 | 1,863,274,495 | 213,177,653 | 339,538,042 |
Total | $ 9,761,923,079 | $ 12,833,308,184 | $ 9,773,060,659 | $ 15,681,911,692 |
Estimate US Revenue 90% | 8,785,730,771 | 11,549,977,366 | 8,795,754,593 | 14,113,720,523 |
Smallest Saleable | $ 7,028,584,617 | $ 9,239,981,893 | $ 7,036,603,674 | $ 11,290,976,418 |
Unit per Final Judgment | ||||
Excluded 20% of Devices | Total = | $ 34,596,146,602 | ||
Page 24 | ||||
Virnetx .5% Royalty Owed | $ 35,142,923 | $ 46,199,909 | $ 35,183,018 | $ 56,454,882 |
(Jury Verdict %) | ||||
Total = | $ 172,980,733.01 | |||
Virnetx 1% Royalty Owed | $ 70,285,846 | $ 92,399,819 | $ 70,366,037 | $ 112,909,764 |
Total = | $ 345,961,466.02 | |||
Virnetx 1.52 Royalty | $ 106,834,486 | $ 140,447,725 | $ 106,956,376 | $ 171,622,842 |
(VHC Asking For) | ||||
Total = | $ 525,861,428.35 | |||
Assumptions: | ||||
Apple does not have a non-infringing workaround | ||||
90% US Estimate is close to being accurate, this number could be revised in either direction. | ||||
The majority of the money is from products not included in the first trial. | ||||
Virnetx is trying to collect this money in post-verdict motions not yet ruled on proving | ||||
new devices are the same as already proven infringing devices . | ||||
Conclusions: | ||||
There is a substantial amount of money at stake for both parties. Even at the .5% rate | ||||
would yield a substantial stream of revenue to Virnetx. | ||||
All numbers could be subject to treble damages if Virnetx proves willful infringement at | ||||
the pending 2015 trial. | ||||
Intellectual Property (IP) Publicly Traded Investment Companies - News, Analysis, Research
Thursday, February 20, 2014
Virnetx v Apple 2013 Royalty Estimates
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Great Post..soon we can hear from judge with 1.5%.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete"Apple does not have a non-infringing workaround" "There is a substantial of money at stake for both parties. Even at the .5% rate" <--- Exactly why "colorably different" ruling much more important than RR.
ReplyDeleteI agree. I explain this concept on an almost daily basis.
DeleteUnder assumptions, I meant to write that I did not include Mac computers. In the court documents Virnetx calculated using the $29 FaceTime upgrade as the saleable unit, instead of the total computer price. I felt the numbers would be immaterial. My Mac contribution totaled about $1.9M.
ReplyDelete